<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GDP Doesn&#8217;t Matter, GDP Per Capita Does</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/</link>
	<description>True Cost attempts to dissect current affairs through the lens of cost-benefit analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecost.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is USA&#039;s GDP per capita really $48,000 as CIA factbook states? More realistic figure would be somewhere $15,000 closer to East Europe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is USA&#8217;s GDP per capita really $48,000 as CIA factbook states? More realistic figure would be somewhere $15,000 closer to East Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Lahey</title>
		<link>http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara Lahey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecost.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may not fit the terms of an official &quot;recession&quot; yet (thanks stimulus check) we just had the first retraction in our GDP of .03% so its on its way!

http://recession.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We may not fit the terms of an official &#8220;recession&#8221; yet (thanks stimulus check) we just had the first retraction in our GDP of .03% so its on its way!</p>
<p><a href="http://recession.org" rel="nofollow">http://recession.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Lahey</title>
		<link>http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara Lahey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecost.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may not fit the terms of an official &lt;a href=&quot;http://recession.org&quot;recession&lt;/a&gt; yet (thanks stimulus check) we just had the first retraction in our GDP of .03% so its on its way!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We may not fit the terms of an official &lt;a href=&#8221;http://recession.org&#8221;recession yet (thanks stimulus check) we just had the first retraction in our GDP of .03% so its on its way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: praveenghanta</title>
		<link>http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[praveenghanta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecost.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point - in the US, at least, median real disposable income would be a better metric. That&#039;s not as true in Europe or Japan, which have much higher rates of public spending, however - and GDP per capita is readily available for almost all countries.

I&#039;ve really conflated two points here, perhaps ineffectively: 1) Using GDP growth as a measure of economic advancement is inaccurate, and overstates America&#039;s lead on other developed economies, and 2) in a recession, the bite will be far worse than the media/politicians tell us, because both negative growth and population are working against us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point &#8211; in the US, at least, median real disposable income would be a better metric. That&#8217;s not as true in Europe or Japan, which have much higher rates of public spending, however &#8211; and GDP per capita is readily available for almost all countries.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve really conflated two points here, perhaps ineffectively: 1) Using GDP growth as a measure of economic advancement is inaccurate, and overstates America&#8217;s lead on other developed economies, and 2) in a recession, the bite will be far worse than the media/politicians tell us, because both negative growth and population are working against us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Mohta</title>
		<link>http://truecostblog.com/2008/01/25/gdp-doesnt-matter-gdp-per-capita-does/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivek Mohta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truecost.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important observation as always. You noted that: 
While GDP per capita doesn’t take into account income inequality and other measures that impact individual well-being, it does a much better job of measuring how economic growth is impacting our lives over time.

I&#039;m curious if you considered median real disposable personal income as a potentially better measure that accounts for both population growth, income inequality, inflation, and taxes/transfers. The median better reflects the slice &quot;an “average” American has&quot; as opposed to the &quot;average slice an American has.&quot; Adjusting for inflation and taxes/transfers reflects the what the &quot;average American&quot; actually has for saving and spending.

I imagine different measures are appropriate for different applications. For example, I think the one I mentioned might be an &lt;a href=&quot;http://vivekmohta.com/blog/2007/05/10/forecasting-presidential-elections/trackback/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;important driver of presidential politics&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important observation as always. You noted that:<br />
While GDP per capita doesn’t take into account income inequality and other measures that impact individual well-being, it does a much better job of measuring how economic growth is impacting our lives over time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious if you considered median real disposable personal income as a potentially better measure that accounts for both population growth, income inequality, inflation, and taxes/transfers. The median better reflects the slice &#8220;an “average” American has&#8221; as opposed to the &#8220;average slice an American has.&#8221; Adjusting for inflation and taxes/transfers reflects the what the &#8220;average American&#8221; actually has for saving and spending.</p>
<p>I imagine different measures are appropriate for different applications. For example, I think the one I mentioned might be an <a href="http://vivekmohta.com/blog/2007/05/10/forecasting-presidential-elections/trackback/" rel="nofollow">important driver of presidential politics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

